Template talk:Heads of State of Malawi

Today, Template talk:Heads of State of Malawi is a topic that has acquired great relevance in various areas of society. From politics to popular culture, Template talk:Heads of State of Malawi has become a constant point of discussion and a source of inspiration for many people. Over time, Template talk:Heads of State of Malawi has grown in importance and has had a significant impact on the way people interact with each other. This article aims to explore in detail the impact of Template talk:Heads of State of Malawi on today's society and examine how it has evolved over time. Likewise, the different perspectives and opinions that exist around Template talk:Heads of State of Malawi will be analyzed, with the aim of providing a comprehensive vision of this very relevant topic.

WikiProject iconAfrica: Malawi Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Malawi.
WikiProject iconPolitics Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Large icons

we should remove some of the icons per MOS:ICON. currently the vertical size of the template is severely stretched. Frietjes (talk) 16:12, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

I think the flags are a problem. Because of the way the template is formatted, I assumed that the upper flag was for the monarchy and the lower one for the republic, but that is not the case. I think the short-lived one that was only in use for less than two years should be removed. DrKiernan (talk) 16:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)