Macrofamily

This article will address Macrofamily, a topic of great relevance and interest today. Macrofamily is an issue that has generated debate and controversy in different areas, awakening the interest of experts, academics and the general public. Over the years, Macrofamily has gained increasing importance due to its impact on society and people's daily lives. In this context, it is pertinent to analyze Macrofamily in detail, exploring its different facets, implications and possible solutions. Likewise, we will seek to offer an objective and enriching perspective on Macrofamily, in order to promote a constructive dialogue and foster greater understanding of this topic.

In historical linguistics, a macrofamily, also called a superfamily or phylum, is a proposed genetic relationship grouping together language families (also isolates) in a larger scale classification. However, Campbell regards this term as superfluous, preferring "language family" for those classifications for which there is consensus and "distant genetic relationship" for those for which there is no, or not yet, consensus, whether due to lack of documentation or scholarship of the constituent languages, or to an estimated time depth thought by many linguists to be too great for reconstruction.[citation needed]

More rarely, the term has also been applied to an exceptionally old, large and diverse language family, such as Afro-Asiatic.

Examples of proposed macro-families range from relatively recent such as East Asian, Macro-Jê, Macro-Waikurúan, Macro-Mayan, Macro-Siouan, Penutian, Dené–Yeniseian and Congo-Saharan (Niger-Saharan) to older ones such as Austric, Dené–Caucasian, Eurasiatic, Nostratic or Ural-Altaic.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Campbell, Lyle and Mixco, Mauricio J. (2007), A Glossary of Historical Linguistics, University of Utah Press/Edinburgh University Press.
  2. ^ Matthews, P.H. (2007), Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics, Oxford University Press.
  3. ^ Campbell, Lyle (2004), Historical Linguistics: An Introduction, Edinburgh University Press.
  4. ^ Diakonoff, Igor M. (1996), "Some reflections on the Afrasian linguistic macrofamily." Journal of Near Eastern Studies 55, 293–294.
  5. ^ Trask, R.L. (2000), The Dictionary of Historical and Comparative Linguistics, Edinburgh University Press.