Today, 2006 Tennis Masters Cup – Singles is a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide variety of people in different parts of the world. The impact that 2006 Tennis Masters Cup – Singles has on our lives is undeniable, whether on a personal, social, economic or political level. Since its emergence, 2006 Tennis Masters Cup – Singles has been the subject of study, analysis and debate by experts in different areas, who seek to understand its implications and consequences. In this article we will explore from different perspectives the phenomenon of 2006 Tennis Masters Cup – Singles and its influence on current society, in order to shed light on this widely discussed topic.
Singles | |
---|---|
2006 Tennis Masters Cup | |
Champion | Roger Federer |
Runner-up | James Blake |
Score | 6–0, 6–3, 6–4 |
Draw | 8 |
Roger Federer defeated James Blake in the final, 6–0, 6–3, 6–4 to win the singles tennis title at the 2006 Tennis Masters Cup. It was his third Tour Finals title.
David Nalbandian was the defending champion, but was defeated in the semifinals by Blake.
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||
1 | Roger Federer | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||
2 | Rafael Nadal | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||
1 | Roger Federer | 6 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
8 | James Blake | 0 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||
8 | James Blake | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
7 | David Nalbandian | 4 | 1 |
Federer | Ljubičić | Roddick | Nalbandian | RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||
1 | Roger Federer | 7–6(7–2), 6–4 | 4–6, 7–6(10–8), 6–4 | 3–6, 6–1, 6–1 | 3–0 | 6–2 (75.00%) |
45–34 | 1 | |
4 | Ivan Ljubičić | 6–7(2–7), 4–6 | 4–6, 7–6(11–9), 1–6 | 5–7, 7–6(9–7), 7–5 | 1–2 | 3–5 (37.50%) |
41–49 | 4 | |
5 | Andy Roddick | 6–4, 6–7(8–10), 4–6 | 6–4, 6–7(9–11), 6–1 | 2–6, 6–7(4–7) | 1–2 | 3–5 (37.50%) |
42–42 | 3 | |
7 | David Nalbandian | 6–3, 1–6, 1–6 | 7–5, 6–7(7–9), 5–7 | 6–2, 7–6(7–4) | 1–2 | 4–4 (50.00%) |
39–42 | 2 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.
Nadal | Davydenko | Robredo | Blake | RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||
2 | Rafael Nadal | 5–7, 6–4, 6–4 | 7–6(7–2), 6–2 | 4–6, 6–7(0–7) | 2–1 | 4–3 | 40–36 | 2 | |
3 | Nikolay Davydenko | 7–5, 4–6, 4–6 | 7–6(10–8), 3–6, 6–1 | 6–2, 4–6, 5–7 | 1–2 | 4–5 | 46–45 | 3 | |
6 | Tommy Robredo | 6–7(2–7), 2–6 | 6–7(8–10), 6–3, 1–6 | 6–2, 3–6, 7–5 | 1–2 | 3–5 | 37–42 | 4 | |
8 | James Blake | 6–4, 7–6(7–0) | 2–6, 6–4, 7–5 | 2–6, 6–3, 5–7 | 2–1 | 5–3 | 41–41 | 1 |
Standings are determined by: 1. number of wins; 2. number of matches; 3. in two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4. in three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5. steering-committee decision.